Note from the Editor: This article has been submitted by the author in "poor English" and we would appreciate better translation from Russian.


By Inventor (pen-name)

It is notorious that, most prevailing form of cosmic objects is sphere.

Cube allows to build most simple coordinate system.

Image:Necker cube.jpg

And tetrahedron tells anyhow in other geometric figures. Meantime, just it is Macrocosm symbol, at least, far be nude fact. However, let you mean about it yourself.
  Well-known that, the fundamental physical interactions are an attribute of Macrocosm. That are gravitation, strong and weak interactions, electromagnetism. They just have formed a matter, space, time+ So that, tetrahedron conjures strange association with them.


 In first, it has four faces, as soon as fundamental interactions. And if it's turned by salient angle, then one face is a pedestal, other is behind and sort of "hidden", more two faces are forward and converge in common edge. If tetrahedron is turned over side, then looks like on a triangle (flat object).  
  And what did we know about fundamental interactions? Gravitation is connected with the concept "down" from gravity force. By the way, all cosmic objects are built up the matter just by it. Generally speaking, it's by the formation cradle of the space-time too. Therefore, Gravitation is own face right.
 Strong interaction is known as nuclear forces phenomena; at least they are only partial phenomena. It is really "hidden", as nucleus in atom, as thermonuclear processes in the stars, as the quarks in nucleons. That's certainly "hidden" face!
 Electromagnetism and weak interaction are "to the view": electromagnetic and neutrino radiations pack all Space (gravitation isn't a radiation, at least, in usual opinion of this word). And well-known that neutrino is the "residency card" of weak interaction. But besides, if we pay our attention electronic sphere of atom, then we had seen, that electron is not only charge corpuscle. It's lepton too. Else say, it has lepton "charge", which is defined just by weak interaction.
However, this strange analogy isn't depleted only the faces fix similarity! The point is that, all interactions have three basic forms, which are similar phenomena two by two.
 Already Albert Einstein, after noting the similarity of two physical law of universal gravitation and Coulomb interaction of electric charges (in which the force diminishes inversely proportional to the square of distance), it attempted to somehow explain this similarity. However, after passing big enough way to the creation of unified field theory, contemporary theoretical physics gives single-valued answer, that the confluence of their nature occurs if and only if space becomes, at least, ten-dimensional! I.e., when gravity and electromagnetism become united, the universe is converted to the unrecognizability. But it means the similarity of two mentioned laws - this simply certain purely descriptive similarity.
Gravity, being manifested in the form of inertia, (i.e., the tendency of body, depending on its mass, to preserve the state of rest, or rectilinear motion with the constant velocity), in essence, is manifested in the macroobjects. So here, it has a similarity to the weak interaction with its manifestation in the nuclear chain reactions inside the stars (but star - these most extended objects in the universe). And by the way, it should be noted that non-chain nuclear processes generally it flows with the constant velocity, i.e., as by themselves "are inertial": they are determined only by the period of the half-life (i.e. by the time during which the reactant is reduced half), and they depend neither on temperature nor on the pressure nor from a quantity of reacting mass. But here the flow of chain reaction is determined, so by that called, by the multiplication factor of neutrons, which directly determines the speed of its flow (if exceed 1, reaction it increases and it is possible to pass into the explosion - hardly then around the stars we could exist some planetary systems), and if it is less - it simply attenuates. So here, when reaction too burns, resultant neutrons find in the very excited state and therefore they are inclined to the beta decay (during, which they are converted into the protons, the electrons and the antineutrino), although, of course, their greatest part supports the flow of nuclear, or more precisely, thermonuclear fusion. In this case superfluous energy is dissipated immediately due to three factors: the formation of elusive neutrinos, formation of electrons with the kinetic energy of sufficient in order to leave the zone of reaction, and due to the fact that the reaction zone "is protonized", and protons to much more complexly force to enter the nuclear reaction because of their electric repulsion. This concerning restraining on the upper limit. By the way, our Sun is just this stage now.
  But if reaction begins too to fade, then, first of all, the beta decay of neutrons occurs increasingly more thinly. Electrons, having lower kinetic energy, are more frequently seized by the protons (K-capture) of the reaction zone (one should remember that indeed these processes proceed against the background of the action of the powerful forces of gravity), as a result of which occurs already "neutronization" of the zone of reaction, i.e., the multiplication factor of neutrons increases. Maintenance on the lower limit so occurs.
And both these of process (beta decay and K-capture) are the "residency card" of precisely weak interaction! Moreover, it should be noted that, certainly, the mass of reactant determines inertness.
However, for chemical chain reactions of any similar "inertia" manifestations it is unknown.
Furthermore, weak interaction is manifested as inertia in the reactive motion (and even as!), in particular, by the explosions new and supernova. The mechanism of this manifestation is fairly complicated, but role here it plays that solving.
Gravity and strong interaction are similar fact that bends the spaces and strictly the strong interaction of quarks is connected with the highest energy levels. But it is possible, probably to speak also about the bend of space for the truly strong interaction, if we consider the conditions of its flow - at temperatures, which are developed, perhaps that somewhere in the depths of neutron stars...
 Magnetic component of electromagnetic interaction looks like on chrome-magnetic component of strong interaction (chrome-magnetic phenomena defines neutron capture by atomic nucleus, in particular. Why, neutron hasn't an electric charge. And a nucleus occupies very small part of atomic volume. Nuclear forces are very close-reacting. Therefore, all earthen substance would be absolutely transparently for it, as soon as for neutrino. However, then, for example, chain nuclear reaction couldn't be going). And physical nature of these phenomena are absolutely different. By the way, strong interaction has chrome-electrical component too. However, it tells anyhow itself in "usual life", i.e. isn't an attribute.
Further, strong and weak interactions are similar to those that both are quantum processes, since they are manifested at the distances less than nuclear dimension. And furthermore, both possess, by the so-called, isotopic symmetry (i.e., weak interaction equally it acts both on the electrons and on neutrino, but strong "does not distinguish" protons and neutrons, receiving them as nucleons). But, in addition this similarity does not completely have any physical basis.
Electromagnetism and weak interaction are similar fact that they formed, its kind the "specularity" of the substance: positive negative electric charge, the north southern magnetic pole (electromagnetism), particle- antiparticle (weak interaction). It is necessary whether to indicate that physical nature of these "specularities" is also different?
  Please pay your attention that these similarities-"edges" add to tetrahedron and check with due faces!
Thus, it very looks like on the typical example of intellectual product, which was coined together with Macrocosm creation. Now then, would we mean it as pure accident? In any case, given fact will be thought fit, at least it is difficult to do+

Copyright 2008 by "Inventor"
All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

The Monkey & the Tetrahedron: Compelling Connections Between Mars, the Ufo Dilemma & the Future of the Human Race

The Monkey & the Tetrahedron: Compelling Connections Between Mars, the Ufo Dilemma & the Future of the Human Race (Paperback)

by David M. Jinks (Author)


Once past the excessive ranting about Carl Sagan in The Monkey and the Tetrahedron, the reader will find a crackerjack compendium of proven, but generally ignored, scientific findings and some compelling theories that tie them all together. While David Jinks's master's degree is in business rather than physics, he compiles information and documents his contentions with the fury of an accountant searching for misappropriated funds. Be glad he's not an auditor for the IRS. Fans of conspiracy theory will revel in the author's brutally blunt questions and hyper-logical deductions concerning transparent distortions supposedly perpetrated by the federal government and allied organizations: Did the 1993 Mars Observer mission really get lost? Does cold fusion overthrow the First Law of Thermodynamics (and corporate interests) by creating more energy than it consumes? Could crop circles be related to the Earth's weakening magnetic field instead of pranksters? Why do highly respected American astronauts believe in UFOs? Read The Monkey and The Tetrahedron and consider the ramifications of these and other important questions. --P. Randall Cohan

Book Description
The Monkey and The Tetrahedron is a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence supporting:

  • the existence of extraterrestrial artifacts

  • the reality of the "excess energy" phenomenon

  • the presence of unusual electromagnetic effects in grain affected by "crop circle" formations

  •  the existence of Unidentified Flying Objects as a non-trivial phenomenon

  • a connection between the human race and an ancient, now "lost" body of knowledge

The Monkey and the Tetrahedron suggests a common thread that may tie these seemingly disparate subjects together, grounding them firmly in the testable scientific realm. With nearly 700 citations and dozens of links to the most reliable, up-to-date internet sources, The Monkey and the Tetrahedron is a virtual encyclopedia of controversial science. Written in non-technical language, The Monkey and the Tetrahedron is 476 pages long and contains 77 illustrations, including official NASA images suggesting that all is not as it seems in the solar system!

The Monkey and the Tetrahedron is for anyone curious about life's Big Questions: How did we get here? Who are we? What is our purpose? and Where are we going? It is for anyone interested in the real scientific evidence supporting the search for life in the universe, the existence of virtually unlimited energy sources, and the possibility of a vastly expanded history and purpose for is for those interested in changing the world and the way humans view themselves in the universe.

Related Articles






Copyright 2008