|
World-Mysteries.com
presents
SECRET MACROCOSM SYMBOL
Note from the Editor: This article has
been submitted by the author in "poor English" and we would appreciate better
translation from Russian.
SECRET MACROCOSM SYMBOL
By Inventor (pen-name)
It is notorious that, most prevailing form of cosmic objects is sphere.
Cube
allows to build most simple coordinate system.
And tetrahedron tells anyhow in
other geometric figures. Meantime, just it is Macrocosm symbol, at least, far be
nude fact. However, let you mean about it yourself.
Well-known that, the fundamental physical interactions are an attribute
of Macrocosm. That are gravitation, strong and weak interactions,
electromagnetism. They just have formed a matter, space, time+ So that,
tetrahedron conjures strange association with them.
In first, it has four faces, as soon as fundamental interactions. And if it's
turned by salient angle, then one face is a pedestal, other is behind and sort
of "hidden", more two faces are forward and converge in common edge. If
tetrahedron is turned over side, then looks like on a triangle (flat object).
And what did we know about fundamental interactions? Gravitation is connected
with the concept "down" from gravity force. By the way, all cosmic objects are
built up the matter just by it. Generally speaking, it's by the formation cradle
of the space-time too. Therefore, Gravitation is own face right.
Strong interaction is known as nuclear forces phenomena; at least they are only
partial phenomena. It is really "hidden", as nucleus in atom, as thermonuclear
processes in the stars, as the quarks in nucleons. That's certainly "hidden"
face!
Electromagnetism and weak interaction are "to the view": electromagnetic and
neutrino radiations pack all Space (gravitation isn't a radiation, at least, in
usual opinion of this word). And well-known that neutrino is the "residency
card" of weak interaction. But besides, if we pay our attention electronic
sphere of atom, then we had seen, that electron is not only charge corpuscle.
It's lepton too. Else say, it has lepton "charge", which is defined just by weak
interaction.
However, this strange analogy isn't depleted only the faces fix similarity! The
point is that, all interactions have three basic forms, which are similar
phenomena two by two.
Already Albert Einstein, after noting the similarity of two physical law of
universal gravitation and Coulomb interaction of electric charges (in which the
force diminishes inversely proportional to the square of distance), it attempted
to somehow explain this similarity. However, after passing big enough way to the
creation of unified field theory, contemporary theoretical physics gives
single-valued answer, that the confluence of their nature occurs if and only if
space becomes, at least, ten-dimensional! I.e., when gravity and
electromagnetism become united, the universe is converted to the
unrecognizability. But it means the similarity of two mentioned laws - this
simply certain purely descriptive similarity.
Gravity, being manifested in the form of inertia, (i.e., the tendency of body,
depending on its mass, to preserve the state of rest, or rectilinear motion with
the constant velocity), in essence, is manifested in the macroobjects. So here,
it has a similarity to the weak interaction with its manifestation in the
nuclear chain reactions inside the stars (but star - these most extended objects
in the universe). And by the way, it should be noted that non-chain nuclear
processes generally it flows with the constant velocity, i.e., as by themselves
"are inertial": they are determined only by the period of the half-life (i.e. by
the time during which the reactant is reduced half), and they depend neither on
temperature nor on the pressure nor from a quantity of reacting mass. But here
the flow of chain reaction is determined, so by that called, by the
multiplication factor of neutrons, which directly determines the speed of its
flow (if exceed 1, reaction it increases and it is possible to pass into the
explosion - hardly then around the stars we could exist some planetary systems),
and if it is less - it simply attenuates. So here, when reaction too burns,
resultant neutrons find in the very excited state and therefore they are
inclined to the beta decay (during, which they are converted into the protons,
the electrons and the antineutrino), although, of course, their greatest part
supports the flow of nuclear, or more precisely, thermonuclear fusion. In this
case superfluous energy is dissipated immediately due to three factors: the
formation of elusive neutrinos, formation of electrons with the kinetic energy
of sufficient in order to leave the zone of reaction, and due to the fact that
the reaction zone "is protonized", and protons to much more complexly force to
enter the nuclear reaction because of their electric repulsion. This concerning
restraining on the upper limit. By the way, our Sun is just this stage now.
But if reaction begins too to fade, then, first of all, the beta decay of
neutrons occurs increasingly more thinly. Electrons, having lower kinetic
energy, are more frequently seized by the protons (K-capture) of the reaction
zone (one should remember that indeed these processes proceed against the
background of the action of the powerful forces of gravity), as a result of
which occurs already "neutronization" of the zone of reaction, i.e., the
multiplication factor of neutrons increases. Maintenance on the lower limit so
occurs.
And both these of process (beta decay and K-capture) are the "residency card" of
precisely weak interaction! Moreover, it should be noted that, certainly, the
mass of reactant determines inertness.
However, for chemical chain reactions of any similar "inertia" manifestations it
is unknown.
Furthermore, weak interaction is manifested as inertia in the reactive motion
(and even as!), in particular, by the explosions new and supernova. The
mechanism of this manifestation is fairly complicated, but role here it plays
that solving.
Gravity and strong interaction are similar fact that bends the spaces and
strictly the strong interaction of quarks is connected with the highest energy
levels. But it is possible, probably to speak also about the bend of space for
the truly strong interaction, if we consider the conditions of its flow - at
temperatures, which are developed, perhaps that somewhere in the depths of
neutron stars...
Magnetic component of electromagnetic interaction looks like on chrome-magnetic
component of strong interaction (chrome-magnetic phenomena defines neutron
capture by atomic nucleus, in particular. Why, neutron hasn't an electric
charge. And a nucleus occupies very small part of atomic volume. Nuclear forces
are very close-reacting. Therefore, all earthen substance would be absolutely
transparently for it, as soon as for neutrino. However, then, for example, chain
nuclear reaction couldn't be going). And physical nature of these phenomena are
absolutely different. By the way, strong interaction has chrome-electrical
component too. However, it tells anyhow itself in "usual life", i.e. isn't an
attribute.
Further, strong and weak interactions are similar to those that both are quantum
processes, since they are manifested at the distances less than nuclear
dimension. And furthermore, both possess, by the so-called, isotopic symmetry
(i.e., weak interaction equally it acts both on the electrons and on neutrino,
but strong "does not distinguish" protons and neutrons, receiving them as
nucleons). But, in addition this similarity does not completely have any
physical basis.
Electromagnetism and weak interaction are similar fact that they formed, its
kind the "specularity" of the substance: positive negative electric charge, the
north southern magnetic pole (electromagnetism), particle- antiparticle (weak
interaction). It is necessary whether to indicate that physical nature of these
"specularities" is also different?
Please pay your attention that these similarities-"edges" add to tetrahedron
and check with due faces!
Thus, it very looks like on the typical example of intellectual product, which
was coined together with Macrocosm creation. Now then, would we mean it as pure
accident? In any case, given fact will be thought fit, at least it is difficult
to do+
Copyright 2008 by "Inventor"
All rights reserved.
Reprinted with permission.
|
 |
The Monkey & the Tetrahedron: Compelling Connections Between
Mars, the Ufo Dilemma & the Future of the Human Race (Paperback)
by David M. Jinks (Author)
|
|
Once past the excessive ranting about Carl Sagan in The Monkey
and the Tetrahedron, the reader will find a crackerjack
compendium of proven, but generally ignored, scientific
findings and some compelling theories that tie them all
together. While David Jinks's master's degree is in business
rather than physics, he compiles information and documents his
contentions with the fury of an accountant searching for
misappropriated funds. Be glad he's not an auditor for the
IRS. Fans of conspiracy theory will revel in the author's
brutally blunt questions and hyper-logical deductions
concerning transparent distortions supposedly perpetrated by
the federal government and allied organizations: Did the 1993
Mars Observer mission really get lost? Does cold fusion
overthrow the First Law of Thermodynamics (and corporate
interests) by creating more energy than it consumes? Could
crop circles be related to the Earth's weakening magnetic
field instead of pranksters? Why do highly respected American
astronauts believe in UFOs? Read The Monkey and The
Tetrahedron and consider the ramifications of these and other
important questions. --P. Randall Cohan
Book Description
The Monkey and The Tetrahedron is a comprehensive synthesis of
the evidence supporting:
-
the existence of extraterrestrial artifacts
-
the reality of the "excess energy" phenomenon
-
the presence of unusual electromagnetic effects
in grain affected by "crop circle" formations
-
the existence of Unidentified Flying
Objects as a non-trivial phenomenon
-
a connection between the human race and an
ancient, now "lost" body of knowledge
The Monkey and the Tetrahedron suggests a common
thread that may tie these seemingly disparate subjects
together, grounding them firmly in the testable scientific
realm. With nearly 700 citations and dozens of links to the
most reliable, up-to-date internet sources, The Monkey and the
Tetrahedron is a virtual encyclopedia of controversial
science. Written in non-technical language, The Monkey and the
Tetrahedron is 476 pages long and contains 77 illustrations,
including official NASA images suggesting that all is not as
it seems in the solar system!
The Monkey and the Tetrahedron is for anyone
curious about life's Big Questions: How did we get here? Who
are we? What is our purpose? and Where are we going? It is for
anyone interested in the real scientific evidence supporting
the search for life in the universe, the existence of
virtually unlimited energy sources, and the possibility of a
vastly expanded history and purpose for humanity...it is for
those interested in changing the world and the way humans view
themselves in the universe.
|
|
|
