The way
you look at an object can affect how you see it. Sometimes there are two images
in the same picture, but you can only see one at a time so your brain chooses
one (when it deals with too much
information).
Cognitive “illusions” rely on stored knowledge about the
world (depth, rabbits, women) and are also under some degree of conscious control (we can
generally reverse the perception at will).
Cognitive illusions.
Instead of demonstrating
a physiological base they interact with different levels of perceptual
processing, in-built assumptions or 'knowledge' are misdirected. Cognitive
illusions are commonly divided into ambiguous illusions, distorting
illusions, paradox illusions, or fiction illusions. They often exploit the
predictive hypotheses of early visual processing. Stereograms are based on
a cognitive visual illusion.
Ambiguous illusions are pictures or objects that offer significant
changes in appearance. Perception will 'switch' between the alternates as
they are considered in turn as available data does not confirm a single
view. The Necker cube is a well known example, the motion parallax due to
movement is being misinterpreted, even in the face of other sensory data.
Another popular is the Rubin vase.
Paradox illusions offer objects that are paradoxical or impossible,
such as the Penrose triangle or impossible staircases seen, for example,
in the work of M. C. Escher. The impossible triangle is an illusion dependent on a
cognitive misunderstanding that adjacent edges must join. They occur as a
byproduct of perceptual learning.
Distorting illusions are the most common, these illusions offer
distortions of size, length, or curvature. They were simple to discover
and are easily repeatable. Many are physiological illusions, such as the
Café wall illusion which exploits the early visual system encoding for
edges.
Other distortions, such as converging line illusions, are more
difficult to place as physiological or cognitive as the depth-cue
challenges they offer are not easily placed. All pictures that have
perspective cues are in effect illusions. Visual judgments as to size are
controlled by perspective or other depth-cues and can easily be wrongly
set.
Fiction illusions are the perception of objects that are genuinely not
there to all but a single observer, such as those induced by schizophrenia
or hallucinogenic drugs.
Cognitive
Illusions - Examples
Ambiguous Figures
Ambiguous figures demonstrates our
ability to shift between figure and ground which provides the
basis for the two interpretations of these figures.
They exemplify the fact that sometimes the same perceptual input can lead to
very different representations. The mind was actively involved
in interpreting the input.
The Reversible Figures


Look at the red dot. Is it located in the upper right front
or the upper right rear? To help you see the different options,
the front wall of the cube is colored gray.

This reversible figure is called the Schroder
Staircase
Are you seeing the stairs from below or above?

Are you looking at this cylinder from left to right
or right to left?
 
Rubin's Vase

Rabbit or
a Duck?

A young lady or an old woman?


Click on 3 images above to enlarge.


Octavio Ocampo
Mouth of flower

Octavio Ocampo
Shiva

Octavio Ocampo
Calvary

Octavio Ocampo
Silver Threads

There are 9 people in this picture, which is a
work
by the Mexican artist
Octavio Ocampo

For more, please visit
Official Website
of Octavio Ocampo

Copyright
2005 by www.World-Mysteries.com
Mysterious Figures: Dark Angel

Copyright
2005 by www.World-Mysteries.com
Killer Whale?
Tessellations
Tessellations in art can be mainly linked to M.C. Escher, a Dutch
artist, born in 1898. After being a graphic artist, he traveled to Spain
and did sketches of the art he saw at the Alhambra, a Morrish temple. He
became interested in tilings and started to incorporate geometric designs
into his art. Escher created hundreds, maybe thousands, of tessellating
shapes in the forms of fish, dogs, crabs, and other beasts.
 
Completion Figures
Completion figures are figures which the mind
rather unambiguously interprets in a particular way despite the fact
that the input is incomplete relative to what is typically "seen". Illusory contours may be partly accounted for by low level contrast
effects, partly by more cognitive processes inferring the existence of
occluding objects.

Triangle Completion - Seeing what is not there!

These two Kanizsa figures shown above illustrate the mind's willingness to see an equilateral
triangle despite the fact that no border information about the center
triangle is in the picture.

Do you see the letter "E" or just black lines?
Paradox Illusions: Impossible Figures and Objects
Impossible Triangle

Impossible Triangle

Version by Penrose

Another version of the
Impossible Triangle

Another version of the
Impossible Triangle
More Impossible Objects

Version of the image first created
by Swedish
artist Oscar Reutersvärd

Impossible stairs

Impossible wheels - by M.C. Escher

Devil's Pitchfork.
This 2-D picture represents a 3d object that cannot possibly exist.

Instructions from hell

Near the ground, you can count five different elephant
feet.
If you cover up the ground, you can only see four limbs extending
from the torso.
 
M.C. Escher was very clever at representing impossible
objects.
Click on the images above to enlarge.

Follow the stairs on the castle terrace.
They appear to be going
up forever!
Image by M.C. Escher.

M.C. Escher "Drawing Hands", 1948 (lithography)
Stereograms - 3D illusions
Stereograms are 3D images hidden within another picture. In order to view the 3-D images, simply stare at the picture until the
image starts to take shape.

Image Courtesy of
Studio V2
3-D Roses. Can you see the hidden image?

Image courtesy of and copyright Gary W. Priester. Source:
http://www.eyetricks.com/3dstereo.htm
Zen Spiral. Can you see the hidden image?
Distorting Illusions
Geometric illusions
Geometric illusions are examples of how our mind attempts to find
orderly representations out of sometimes ambiguous and disorderly 2d
images. The images transmitted from our retina to our brain are imperfect
representation of reality (for example 2d images cannot accurately
represent 3d space). Our visual system is capable of performing complex
processing of information received from the eyes in order to extract
meaningful perceptions. Sometimes, however, this process can lead to faulty
perceptions.

The Café Wall Illusion. Are the lines crooked are straight? If you stare at a
single cube, do the adjacent lines appear to slide past each other?
Some visual stimuli cannot be perceived in a way that accords with what
we can measure (with a ruler or similar) e.g. The Café Wall Illusion Even
if we know that the lines of mortar are all straight, we see them as
sloping. Illusions are cases where we find significant differences between
perceived and measured reality (a very broad definition).
Müller-Lyer Illusion


The center connecting line is seen as shorter
in the top figure that in
the lower figure.

The figure above shows both figures
superimposed on one another in order to demonstrate in yet another way
that the center line is of equal length in both figures.

Which line is longer, AB or BC?
They are the same length.
Ebbinghaus Illusion
You probably perceive the middle circle as smaller in the
figure on the left than the circle in the center of the second figure.
They are actually the same size.
 
Ebbinghaus Illusion
Perspective, Depth and Distance
Your eyes judge distance based on the size of objects and where the
objects are positioned. For example, if you don’t know the size of two
objects, you may see one as smaller because it is farther away. In
reality, the objects are the same size. An easy way to think about this is
by using train tracks. Train tracks appear to get smaller as they get
farther away, but as you move along them, you see they are the same. Lines
that appear to come together in the distance make you have a distorted
perception of distance.

© World-Mysteries.com
Perspective is an illusion that makes parallel road
lines
appear to come together in the distance.

Version of Ponzo Illusion.
Perspective illusion. Both yellow lines are the same length.
Moon Illusion
The variation in the apparent size of the Moon (smaller when
overhead, larger when near the horizon) is another natural illusion; it is
not an optical phenomenon, but rather a cognitive or perceptual illusion.

Image based on photo by R. Berdan
Moon Illusion. The moon illusion is one of the most famous of
all illusions. Stated simply, the full moon, when just above the horizon,
appears much larger than when it is overhead. Yet the moon, a quarter of a
million miles away from the earth, always subtends the same angle wherever
it is in the sky, roughly 0.5 degrees.
Explanation: Is the Moon larger when near the horizon? No -- as shown
above, the Moon appears to be very nearly the same size no matter its
location on the sky. Oddly, the cause or causes for the common Moon
Illusion are still being debated. Two leading explanations both hinge on
the illusion that foreground objects make a horizon Moon seem farther in
the distance. The historically most popular explanation then holds that
the mind interprets more distant objects as wider, while a more recent
explanation adds that the distance illusion may actually make the eye
focus differently. Either way, the angular diameter of the Moon is always
about 0.5 degrees. In the above time-lapse sequence taken near the end of
last year, the Moon was briefly re-imaged every 2.5 minutes, with the last
exposure of longer duration to bring up a magnificent panorama of the city
of Seattle.

Moonrise Over Seattle. Credit & Copyright: Shay
Stephens
Source:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020130.html
Sky watchers have known this for thousands of years: moons hanging low in
the sky look unnaturally big. Cameras don't see it, but our eyes do.
How does this illusion come about? Since the moon always subtends an
angle of 0.5 degrees, the image on the retina must always be the same.
Clearly the problem is one of interpretation. One simple experiment shows
this to be so. A full moon just above the horizon will not appear so large
to the human eye if a piece of paper is held up to that eye with a hole in
it, so that only the moon can be seen through the hole and not the
horizon. If the other eye is open at the same time, viewing both the moon
and the horizon, the two eyes will each see different sized moons!
The explanation is believed to be as follows. We 'know' that a cloud
that is overhead will be larger than when it moves towards the horizon.
And an airplane that is a mere speck on the horizon becomes large when it
is overhead. And we are all familiar with standing under a tree which
seems enormous, yet at a couple of hundred paces seems insignificant. It
would seem that so much of our world is interpreted this way that we are
ill-equipped to cope with an object like the moon, that subtends the same
angle at the eye, whatever position it occupies in the sky. And so our
brain 'interprets' the image that it 'sees', and tells us that the moon is
larger than it really is.
People have thought that the thicker atmosphere along the horizon could
act as a magnifying glass enlarging the image of the full Moon when it is
on the horizon. That could not be the case as there is not enough
atmosphere around the Earth to cause a dramatic lens effect. Anyway,
according to the laws of physics, if the atmosphere was really refracting
the image of the Moon, it would appear smaller!

Regardless of its elevation, the distance between an
observer (at the center of the horizontal line) and the moon remains
constant (unfilled circles). However, a moon perceived as growing closer
as its elevation increases (filled circles), must appear as growing
smaller. Source:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/1/500
Some scientists have proposed that the Moon Illusion effect depends on
our perception of the sky as a flat-topped dome the rim of which appears
further away than the top of the dome. The effect of this error in
perspective is for the Moon overhead to appear smaller than the horizon
Moon. The diagram (fig. 2) opposite shows the apparent location of the
Moon at various points as it travels across the sky. This is the diagram
commonly seen in books promoting this hypothesis… But the diagram can be
misleading! The hemispherical flat-topped dome in the picture is not of
proven relevance to the effect and ought to be omitted as it falsely
suggests a mental process of "projecting" the moon onto that dome.
Others have proposed that the Moon Illusion had to do with the fact
that the eye-brain system is designed to work on the horizontal plane, not
the vertical plane. On the horizon we process the Moon image in the
optimal orientation giving us its true apparent size. Tipping our head
back to view the high Moon, we see a non-optimal image. The illusion is
not that the horizon Moon is larger, but that the overhead Moon is smaller
in size than it "ought" to be. Others have argued that comparisons with
buildings and other objects on the horizon are responsible for the
differences between the Moon’s apparent size when looking horizontally and
looking vertically (this explanation is contradicted by the fact that the
Moon Illusion also occurs over open water).
Finally, here is an explanation that is sufficiently satisfactory. The
effect of this illusion is due mainly to the fact that our brain
interprets the sky as being farther away near the horizon, and closer near
the zenith (directly overhead, see fig. 3 opposite). This isn’t
surprising; look at the sky on a cloudy day and the clouds overhead may be
a few kilometers above you, but near the horizon they might be hundreds of
kilometers away. The Moon, when it’s on the horizon, is interpreted by
your brain as being farther away. Since it’s the same apparent size as
when it’s high up, your brain figures it must be physically bigger (as
illustrated in fig. 4 further below). Otherwise, the distance would make
it look smaller. This effect is the well-known Ponzo Illusion (fig. 5.a).
Actually, the Moon Illusion effect is the result of a mix of Ebbinghaus
size illusion (fig. 5.b) plus Ponzo illusion (see resulting fig. 6).




Source:
http://www.archimedes-lab.org/atelier.html?http://www.archimedes-lab.org/moon_illusion/moon.html
_ _ _
Moon Illusion Links:
Illusions Links
Introduction |
Physical Illusions |
Physiological Illusions |
Cognitive Illusions |
Links
Contact Us
- contact@world-mysteries.com ( please cut
and paste or type in )

|