PS
Hydrostatic Therapy® MANUAL
Based on the Piezoelectric Principle
Harold Cober Ph.D. 2001
Miroslav indicates intermediate conduction zones not
shown here. Still more energy is freed in the convergent zones. It
is also here that torsion fields can form and become matter.

Every object has its own energy in its immediate
space but radiates energies that not only propagate in space but
accumulates and stores. Our good friend Miraslav Provod from the
Czech Republic has done extensive testing on this postulate, one of
which we tried to show here. He has
done extensive testing on raising the P-charge of water and its
storage capacity in stones
"The diagram shows two large trees and their
energy components. The experiment had the purpose to demonstrate
conductivity of E-zones for cosmic energy. The transfer of energy will
proceed from point "A" situated in the third E-zone of
tree No. 1, and point "B" placed in the sixth E-zone of
tree No. 2. The two points were chosen arbitrarily, the
performance is identical between any other two points in the
E-zones of the trees. The experiment will have the following
course: a group of capacitors with a total capacity of about 1.5 F
is placed at point A. The assistant is then seated on a wooden
chair at point B. We determine the assistan's energy space and
record the value rES = 40 cm. Then we connect the group of
capacitors to a 12 V source. On rechecking the assistan' s energy
space we find the value of rES = 110 cm. The experiment can be
repeated and always gives the same result. The same rule governs
transfer of energy between all kinds of P-charges. On entry of the
smaller P-charge into the energy component of the larger P-charge,
the rES of the former will immediately increase to the final
value, acquired by a one-hour dwell in the energy component of the
larger P-charge. Short term exposure to the energy component of
the larger P-charge brings about no energy yield." www.pribram.czlcentrum
Exactly what is the agent that brings these energy
shifts about? We have concluded it is the non-Hertzian charge
liberated by the percussion of the crashing wave fronts by the
Quantum Piezoelectrically Force. This force is activated by motion,
music, prayer, Reiki, weather fronts,
etc. Let me count the ways - it is implicit in the mechanical form
in breathing, laughing, chewing, exercise, isometric, walking
Reflexology, Massage, Acupressure, Chiropractic (releasing of Chi)
to name a few. It can be seen ay work at the ocean shore, whirl pool
We inadvertently stumble on foot pressure and release as a
piezoelectric pump from an add we received for footware. "When
we walk Back-Pressure develop in our sole. With required pressure
Electricity is generated. This electricity charges our internal
organs & endocrine glands to keep them active & efficient.
This pressure also help to raise blood against gravity." It
hits on something we have missed. We know the compression and
release of muscles during exercise raises the current 01prime but
this is describing the piezoelectric principle on the foot. In order
to ascertain if reflexology or walking might employ this release, we
had a client hold the multimeter probes between the thumb and first
finger and then rhythmically squeeze and release. This graph was run
in real-time and represents a brief session. It is obvious that the
charge increased slowly.

Physics during the age of megaliths
Over more than twenty years, I have realized hundreds of
experiments, which were mostly motivated by trying to uncover the
reasons and causes of not always convincingly explained working
activities of ancient civilizations. In these experiments, I came to
the conclusion that many activities of ancient prehistoric cultures
were clearly motivated by the desire to exploit knowledge about the
attributes of static electricity. Even in academic publications, I
found no information on the range of the found properties of static
electricity. It cannot be therefore excluded that they have never
been published. For this reason, I admit it might be an entirely new
knowledge.

Four probably yet unpublished properties of static electricity
showed on the theme of implementation of many megalithic and
religious structures. Many often seemingly useless construction
activities of our ancestors could not be convincingly and logically
explained without the connection with these new findings of the
properties of static electricity. Historians and archaeologists have
often helped themselves out by saying that the motivation for
constructing many buildings in our history was based solely on a
"ritual" or "calendar reason". All
researchers and scientists who "dared" linking knowledge
of ancient cultures with modern knowledge of the physical energies
were often ridiculed by generally accepted capacities and rendered
as being textbook ignorants. The four properties of static
electricity introduced are however far from a total explanation of
all yet difficult to explain mysteries of our history. In some
cases, the new knowledge about the properties of matter in
connection with a charge of static electricity provides only partial
explanation to the historical mysteries, which suggests that there
can be many more unidentified properties of static electricity.
There is no doubt that there is an incorrect interpretation of
certain parts of history in connection with the explanation of the
motives for constructing many complex, but even the simplest of old
buildings. It is therefore necessary to examine the question of
logical reasons for building the constructions in context with new
physical knowledge, which demonstrates that "knowledge" of
ancient and extinct cultures surpassed the knowledge of modern
history. The "ritual dogmas" will need to be replaced by
new energy knowledge. This will create a real picture of the
evolution of world cultures as well as a "springboard" for
further research in some historical periods. However, there
are the already mentioned "scientific" obstacles that
discourage many that are interested in modern research. These
obstacles that psychologically bind the thinking of many researchers
that are eager for truth are the skeptics. The skeptics, in an
effort to stand out, which they cannot achieve in a different field
of science, serve as scientific inquisitors. Being a skeptic is very
easy as skeptics always respond to new ideas by saying
"Everything that cannot be put in context with known facts
cannot be assessed." They refuse to respect the fact that all
new findings were found behind the edge of known facts in most
cases.
I was saddened, for example, when the
skeptics in the Czech Republic attached an 'erratic boulder' to
Erich von Daniken. Even if Daniken did not bring any revolutionary
ideas in his work, he would have done more for the promotion of
history than all the Czech inquisitional skeptics combined. Daniken
inspired hundreds of thousands of researchers around the world by
his extensive work - thousands of them chose their field of work due
to his exploratory study. And last but not least, after centuries of
neglect many historical monuments that were described by Daniken are
now cracking under the pressure of curious tourists. Daniken fully
described the megalithic culture in his writings. Literary works by
Erich Daniken are well above the writings of other authors, who
constantly repeat pieces of information that have already been
published many times. I have studied all the writings of Erich
Daniken and I can say that I gained more knowledge about the
megaliths from his literature than I would have received by personal
visits to the places described. There are more such cases, which I
will not address here. I regard the 'erratic boulder' given to Erich
Daniken as the worst injustice. Skeptics could not have
objected to the way Mr. Daniken describes the megalithic culture,
but they likely just disagreed with his opinion that it could not
have been created by a 'textbook type' civilization and that ancient
cultures received the information from some advanced cultures from
outer space. And here is the discord, skeptics recognize the current
interpretation of history, Mr. Daniken, as well as many logically
thinking people, does not. It does not matter where the ancient
cultures received the information. The fact is that they must have
obtained it somewhere. The view of Mr. Daniken that ancient cultures
may have obtained the information from space cannot be assessed in
any other way then as a creative idea. Any doubts about the
astronauts from other planets can encourage others to think about
other explanations. The essence of the literary work of Mr. Daniken
is not just getting the source of information, but it is the whole
megalithic culture. Reacting to the opinion of Mr. Daniken by
granting him an 'erratic boulder' seems amateur and inappropriate.
People expect from scientists that they will scientifically and
properly reason their decision. If skeptics think that people
used to build thousands of megaliths all over the world for ritual
and calendar purposes (as is currently mentioned in history) they
only compromise themselves in the same way as archaeologists do.
Unless it is explained what tools were used to machine the hardest
diorite rock, unless it is experimentally demonstrated that it is
possible to transport a block of rock weighing one thousand tons to
a distance of two kilometers solely by the use of pulling and ropes,
unless it is explained how people communicated with each other when
they built the same types of megalithic structures around the world
the account of Mr. Daniken cannot be clearly and categorically
questioned. In this case, the purposely formulated assumption
proposed by the skeptics by granting Erich von Daniken an 'erratic
boulder' stated exactly the opposite. They reached a phase where
public begun to question statements given by the skeptics.
The new knowledge about static electricity resulting from the
research of megaliths seems like a great hint not only for the
research of ancient cultures but also for several other fields. In
addition, we can expect further findings of the unknown properties
of static electricity.
I remind the importance of the four attributes of static
electricity, which I describe in dozens of articles at http://www.miroslavprovod.com
- Each material has a charge with three energy components (aura,
zones, and interzones).
- When auras of two or more charges come
into contact they merge into one common charge with common energy
components.
- By merging charges into a joint charge, there is a
gradual equalizing of their energetic potentials.
- During the
equalizing of energetic potentials there is also a transfer of
chemical properties.
October 2010 Miroslav Provod
© 2010 Miroslav Provod
All rights reserved.
Presented with permission.
Official Website: www.miroslavprovod.com
|