On the Forbidden Letters by CE2
Dear visitors of World-Mysteries,
A few weeks ago we discovered through a Forum the Forbidden Letters at
World-Mysteries. The information in the Letters is impressive. And the
speculations of the authors, apart from their speculations on the macrocosmic
female, are our speculations too.
We address you here and now because we have extra information that will, in
our opinion, balance the information given in the Letters.
Here we go.
Alchemy is not only the 'goal of evolution', as the Paris 4 say, it is on top
the one force that fights entropy. And is thereby evolution proper.
Another important detail on alchemy that wasn't mentioned by the Paris 4 in
the Letters is the alchemical saying 'You need Gold, to make Gold'. Important,
because we wouldn't be surprised if it is fetched by some, for the benefit of
many...
(And would they be called solar heroes? Microscosmic solar heroes? They would
indeed!)
Which brings us to a little brainteaser we composed this morning. A
brainteaser concerning that great day that is going to be during either the
papacy of Pope Benedict, or petrus romanus. ( Like the Paris 4, we weren't able
to solve that problem either.)
'New York. No Adam, no Eve. The triangle of the Emperor.'
Last, but not least, we would like to share with you some quotes on the
Forbidden Letters taken from Forums.
I.
Forum-member 'Seer' writes:
"Homosexuality is an abomination to God, and a grevious sin. So why would we
believe any of this?"
Then 'Coffeeshop' replies:
"My kid-brother is homosexual and I must admit that I don't trust the
teachings on homosexuality in the bible at all.
Imagine, God created the universe, the galaxies, and everything, and then he
becomes unbalanced by homosexuals making love? A love that can't even hurt
anybody. One thinks, that cannot be true.
Somebody once said: we all know how homosexuality became condemned in the
bible: Moses had something against homosexuality, and therefor God had something
against homosexuality. The prophet taking too easily his own will for the will
of God.
And let's look what the Bible actually says about the source of
homosexuality. It is punishment for sin. Here is the part.
21] Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither
were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart
was darkened.
[22] Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
[23] And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like
to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
[24] Wherefore God also gave them
(He himself gives them up to this! So he has a part in this too!)
up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their
own bodies between themselves:
[25] Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the
creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
(That Amen tells me that Paul is not at all sure about his way of 'reasoning'
here.)
[26] For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections:
(Again, God is at least partner here.)
for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against
nature:
[27] And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned
in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly,
and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
[28] And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave
them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
[29] Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness,
covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity;
whisperers,
[30] Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of
evil things, disobedient to parents,
[31] Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection,
implacable, unmerciful:
Gay people are all that? Some of the finest people on earth, like Plato and
da Vinci and Michelangelo? Without natural affection? Inventors of evil things?
[32] Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are
worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
So (32) God punishes men for their sins with the homosexual act. And for that
act they have to be punished again? I think that only works for homophobic
people.
I think I know what is going on here. This is Paul who wants to save the
demand for the death penalty of the Old Testament, and who doesn't understand
why there can be an omnipotent God who hates homosexuality, and a gay-life at
the same time. And hence the terrible mess in Romans.
And on top of this: the letters claim that the New Testament is merely a
vehicle for alchemy (and they say homosexuality is a requirement for alchemy).
Now, we don't know whether that is true, but it explains the, let's say,
sligthtly unheterosexual Jesus is in the Gospels (fiction, alchemical fiction,
according to the Paris 4).
On top of that, you can get anything from the Bible. What about Jonathan and
David for instance? That's not merely about friendship... "
II.
'Linda K.' writes:
"The tree of life is not a secret. Study Kabbalah, learn more."
'Back' answers:
"Quaballah is a mediocre adaptation of alchemy. Not older than the 11th
century. Mind you, Quaballists do their best to state that an oral tradition
existed, preferably 'since the dawn of time'... A tradition we cannot check upon
ofcourse...
The oral tradition-construction is the oldest trick in the book. So one
wouldn't have to admit one borrowed metaphysical knowledge from alien sources.
No religion or mystical school likes to admit that. Their Tree of Life on top is
a laugh. Especially compared to the one of Tantra."
III.
'Scug', an atheist, writes:
"I guess the part I'm having the most trouble with is the parts that seems to
assume there is a theory in all that clap trap. Maybe I'll have to print it out
and draw some diagrams to put it together... I see no clear thought at all in
those letters, so I'll have to say no. Still seems to circle around supernatural
notions."
IV.
Two atheists discussing the Letters. First 'Alimck', then 'Laborsolis'
'Alimck' says:
"None the less, you are asking atheists if they believe in god."
The reply by 'Laborsolis' :
"I'm asking them about the alchemical theory. metaphysos doesn't
automatically imply hyperphysos. In other words: a paradise doesn't have to
imply a god."
V.
'Speck' writes:
" I had a good long look at those letters and I will give you my insight in
them.The gay man is the butterfly. The circle being completed. Sacred geometry
in action.
I can't wait for this man to emerge from hiding, to where we can all see him
and follow in his footsteps.Get ready brothers and sisters - humanity is taking
off !!"
VI.
'Enligtened' Idiot says:
If you know anything at all you will also know that this gay guy is the
antichrist. If you care about anything at all you will realise that now is the
time to take up the armour of God and read your Bible with more intent than to
please your mother.
God help us all.
VII.
'Eager' writes:
"Dismissed without even bothering to read the letters.
Alchemy = bullshit
Therefore, arguments entirely based on alchemy = bullshit.
The topic starter stated that god exists in alchemy, therefore the claim is
based on bullshit unless it is shown that alchemy isn't crap. Cookies and a hug
to the first person that can show me that alchemy is to be taken seriously.
After that I *might* consider reading those damn letters."
VIII.
And our last post is by 'Upwinger':
"Fascinating .. a mythos in the making!"
From a city in [C]entral [E]urope, and with our best wishes,
The CE2.
Note: Reprinted with permission
The Forbidden Letters - Main Menu
