WELCOME PAGE  |  SITE MAP  |  WHAT'S NEW  |  GUEST AUTHORS  |  WALLPAPER  |  SHOP  |  ABOUT US        


     

   You Are Here:  HOME >> FORBIDDEN LETTERS >> RESPONSES



FORBIDDEN LETTERS MNU

The Forbidden Letters to Philip Gardiner

 THE FORBIDDEN LETTERS
The Letters
PS by Philip Gardiner  
Part 2 - by Paris 4
 NEWSLETTER BY PARIS 4
Newsletter 1
Newsletter 2
Newsletter 3
Newsletter 4
Newsletter 5
Newsletter 6
 RESPONSES 
Gary Osborn 
Magnus Strom
Hugo Palts  
CE2
David Goldberg
Daniel Srsa
Anna Moshiu
Anton Schneider
Thonus Furious (2 art.) 
Hanno Temming
Anna Pietropoli 
Otto Reich *
Jonathan Rice *
Don Willis
Antoine de la Censerie *
RFC *
John Fox
Mark O'Neill
Paula Johnson
John Hume
Guillaume Bernier
Guido Popp
Richard Morley
Maud Perkins
Emile de Beauregard
Paul Cambronne *
Hugo Dewasme
Maria El Safti *
J. & W. Kaposi
Heinz Lichtenberg
Anil Sriram
Onno de Bie
Pablo Uribe
Christine Liebreich
Julius Breitner
David E
Paula Braun
anonymous
F. P. da Silva
Julia Cicci
Mirjam de Heer
Jos Winter
Betty Martin
Peter Wong
HK
Joan Quin
Pedro Caz
Richard Cayce
Rene Loman
Ieounas Urano  
Sandra Milten
Harris & Strom
Ingo Berg
Wilhelm Wundt
Adam Kadmon
Bashir Ibn Salah
Beate Schulz
Judy Brooks  
W-M Editor  
Anonymous
Daniel Witzen
Zita Christensen
Henk Jansen
*recommended by the Paris 4
 RELATED LINKS
PhilipGardiner (WM)
Splendor Solis
Aliens in Archaeology
Gary Osborn
Philip Gardiner
Gardiner
Ed Ziomek
Alchemy

 


   




SCIENCE MYSTERIES STRANGE ARTIFACTS  |   MYSTIC PLACES  |   ANCIENT WRITINGS
  

 Note: The following letters are reprinted with permission.

On the Forbidden Letters by CE2 

Dear visitors of World-Mysteries,

A few weeks ago we discovered through a Forum the Forbidden Letters at World-Mysteries. The information in the Letters is impressive. And the speculations of the authors, apart from their speculations on the macrocosmic female, are our speculations too.

We address you here and now because we have extra information that will, in our opinion, balance the information given in the Letters.

Here we go.

Alchemy is not only the 'goal of evolution', as the Paris 4 say, it is on top the one force that fights entropy. And is thereby evolution proper.

Another important detail on alchemy that wasn't mentioned by the Paris 4 in the Letters is the alchemical saying 'You need Gold, to make Gold'. Important, because we wouldn't be surprised if it is fetched by some, for the benefit of many...

(And would they be called solar heroes? Microscosmic solar heroes? They would indeed!)

Which brings us to a little brainteaser we composed this morning. A brainteaser concerning that great day that is going to be during either the papacy of Pope Benedict, or petrus romanus. ( Like the Paris 4, we weren't able to solve that problem either.)

'New York. No Adam, no Eve. The triangle of the Emperor.'

Last, but not least, we would like to share with you some quotes on the Forbidden Letters taken from Forums.


I.

Forum-member 'Seer' writes:

"Homosexuality is an abomination to God, and a grevious sin. So why would we believe any of this?"

Then 'Coffeeshop' replies:

"My kid-brother is homosexual and I must admit that I don't trust the teachings on homosexuality in the bible at all.

Imagine, God created the universe, the galaxies, and everything, and then he becomes unbalanced by homosexuals making love? A love that can't even hurt anybody. One thinks, that cannot be true.

Somebody once said: we all know how homosexuality became condemned in the bible: Moses had something against homosexuality, and therefor God had something against homosexuality. The prophet taking too easily his own will for the will of God.

And let's look what the Bible actually says about the source of homosexuality. It is punishment for sin. Here is the part.

[21] Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

[22] Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

[23] And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

[24] Wherefore God also gave them  (He himself gives them up to this! So he has a part in this too!) up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

[25] Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. (That Amen tells me that Paul is not at all sure about his way of 'reasoning' here.)

[26] For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: (Again, God is at least partner here.) 
for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

[27] And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

[28] And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

[29] Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

[30] Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

[31] Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

Gay people are all that? Some of the finest people on earth, like Plato and da Vinci and Michelangelo? Without natural affection? Inventors of evil things?

[32] Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

So (32) God punishes men for their sins with the homosexual act. And for that act they have to be punished again? I think that only works for homophobic people.

I think I know what is going on here. This is Paul who wants to save the demand for the death penalty of the Old Testament, and who doesn't understand why there can be an omnipotent God who hates homosexuality, and a gay-life at the same time. And hence the terrible mess in Romans. 

And on top of this: the letters claim that the New Testament is merely a vehicle for alchemy (and they say homosexuality is a requirement for alchemy). Now, we don't know whether that is true, but it explains the, let's say, sligthtly unheterosexual Jesus is in the Gospels (fiction, alchemical fiction, according to the Paris 4).

On top of that, you can get anything from the Bible. What about Jonathan and David for instance? That's not merely about friendship... "


II.

'Linda K.' writes:

"The tree of life is not a secret. Study Kabbalah, learn more."

'Back' answers:

"Quaballah is a mediocre adaptation of alchemy. Not older than the 11th century. Mind you, Quaballists do their best to state that an oral tradition existed, preferably 'since the dawn of time'... A tradition we cannot check upon ofcourse...

The oral tradition-construction is the oldest trick in the book. So one wouldn't have to admit one borrowed metaphysical knowledge from alien sources. No religion or mystical school likes to admit that. Their Tree of Life on top is a laugh. Especially compared to the one of Tantra."


III.

'Scug', an atheist, writes:

"I guess the part I'm having the most trouble with is the parts that seems to assume there is a theory in all that clap trap. Maybe I'll have to print it out and draw some diagrams to put it together... I see no clear thought at all in those letters, so I'll have to say no. Still seems to circle around supernatural notions."


IV.

Two atheists discussing the Letters. First 'Alimck', then 'Laborsolis'

'Alimck' says:

"None the less, you are asking atheists if they believe in god."

The reply by 'Laborsolis' :

"I'm asking them about the alchemical theory. metaphysos doesn't automatically imply hyperphysos. In other words: a paradise doesn't have to imply a god."


V.

'Speck' writes:

" I had a good long look at those letters and I will give you my insight in them.The gay man is the butterfly. The circle being completed. Sacred geometry in action.

I can't wait for this man to emerge from hiding, to where we can all see him and follow in his footsteps.Get ready brothers and sisters - humanity is taking off !!"


VI.

'Enligtened' Idiot says:

If you know anything at all you will also know that this gay guy is the antichrist. If you care about anything at all you will realise that now is the time to take up the armour of God and read your Bible with more intent than to please your mother.

God help us all.


VII.

'Eager' writes:

"Dismissed without even bothering to read the letters.

Alchemy = bullshit

Therefore, arguments entirely based on alchemy = bullshit.

The topic starter stated that god exists in alchemy, therefore the claim is based on bullshit unless it is shown that alchemy isn't crap. Cookies and a hug to the first person that can show me that alchemy is to be taken seriously. After that I *might* consider reading those damn letters."


VIII.

And our last post is by 'Upwinger':

"Fascinating .. a mythos in the making!"

From a city in [C]entral [E]urope, and with our best wishes,

The CE2.

:::  Hosted by Lunarpages   :::  This Website was launched on March 26, 2002  ::: 

 Recommended: 1920x1200+ display, CSS and Java Script support : : : Hosted by Lunarpages
2002-2008, World-Mysteries.com, All Rights Reserved.